Measure the gap.
Compare the candidate's supplied evidence against the occupational requirements for the role they actually want.
Skills 71 · Qualifications 55 · Experience 74
Career intelligence, not CV guesswork
See what is holding someone back.
UKCIP turns candidate evidence into a clear view of role readiness — what is strong, what is missing, why it matters and what changes the outcome.
This sample uses a fictional candidate and employer so every score, gap and conclusion can be inspected openly.
Candidate intelligence snapshotLogistics & Distribution Manager
Evidence guard activeCandidate evidenceRole requirementsUKCIP analysis67.9
67.9Role fit
Promising — but not ready yet.
Strong supervision and safety evidence. A meaningful systems gap is holding the overall result back.
Developing67.9 · CurrentStrong
Safety strongExperience strongSystems gap
Skills evidence
Role requirement90
Candidate evidence71
Gap: −19 pointsMain weakness: warehouse systems evidence. Stronger WMS, ERP or digital stock-control evidence would materially improve this score.
“Cut staff turnover by 40%”No supporting evidence supplied — excluded from the score.
+0
3,040ESCO occupations
WCAG 2.2 AAAccessibility standard
0Fabrications by design
What UKCIP changes
From application guesswork to evidence-led action.
A score on its own is not useful. The value comes from showing why the score exists, what is missing and what the person can do next.
Trace every conclusion.
Every positive and negative finding links back to candidate-supplied evidence. Unsupported claims do not quietly become facts.
Evidence presentcounted · Evidence absentnot counted
Turn gaps into action.
Instead of “you are not suitable,” the user sees the specific areas to strengthen, evidence to gather and development to target.
Gapactionnew evidencereassessment
One platform · different decisions
The same evidence becomes useful intelligence for five audiences.
Select an audience to see the decision UKCIP helps them make.
For candidates
Know what is stopping you before you apply.
See the specific strengths and gaps between your evidence and the role, rather than discovering the mismatch after another rejection.
“Systems is 24 points down and rests on one line.”
Where the sample sits
Gap analysis is one stage in the wider career intelligence loop.
The report is one working layer of the wider platform. Improve the evidence or close a gap and the assessment can be run again.
01Self-assessment & profilingRoadmap
02Role match & targetingRoadmap
03Evidence collectionRoadmap
04CV writerLive
05Gap analysisSample report
06Cover letterLive
07LinkedIn profileLive
08Interview coachingRoadmap
09Training & developmentRoadmap
Live todayRoadmapSample stage
It is a loop, not a line. Close a gap, add stronger evidence, rerun the assessment and the picture changes. The report is not a verdict on a person; it is an evidence-based view of where they stand now.
Inspect the output
Don't take our word for it. Read the report.
Different role. Same evidence discipline. Same method. The point is not the score — it is that the score can be explained.
Worked exampleLogisticsLogistics and distribution manager. Strong on safety and supervision, with one substantial systems gap.
Coming nextCareSoonA second worked example will show the same method applied to a very different occupational setting.
No sign-up · No email wall · Nothing withheld
01Understand
02Improve
03Reassess
UKCIP does not simply tell someone they are unsuitable. It shows what changes the answer.