01 · Assess
Know yourself
Traits, interests and working style, reflected back through validated structures.
Demo availableUK Career Intelligence Platform
Stop applying blind.
See what the job actually asks for, and what your evidence actually shows.
Then close the distance between them — without inventing a single thing.
Every AI-written line is checked against your own evidence before you see it
Watch it refuse to embellish.
Source — candidate evidence · Oakfield Care
Supervised a team of six care assistants across two units, and rewrote the shift handover so nothing was lost between rotas.
Checked against sourceEvery fact in this line traces back to something the candidate stated and confirmed. It ships.
Supervised a team of six care assistants across two units, and rewrote the shift handover, cutting staff turnover by a third.
Blocked — not in evidenceThe turnover claim appears nowhere in her evidence. The guard holds the line back and asks her for it, rather than printing something that sounds right.
Example — illustrative
The journey
Five movements. It peaks at the interview, not the document.
The CV is one output of nine capabilities, not the product.
02 · Match
Find the fit
Your evidenced position measured against structured occupational requirements.
03 · Build
Show the proof
Evidence collection, CV, gap analysis, cover letter and LinkedIn profile.
04 · Prepare
Rehearse it
Practise defending every line you have put your name to.
In development05 · Interview-ready
Walk in able to prove it
Nothing on the page you cannot stand behind in the room.
Training and development loops back to 02
How it works
Measure the person. Measure the role. Explain the distance.
A fixed arithmetic blend, disclosed in full. The same inputs always produce the same result, and the result can always be taken apart.
Measure the person
Skills, qualifications and experience, each one traced to something the candidate stated and confirmed.
Measure the role
Structured occupational requirements drawn from a published taxonomy, not from a job advert's adjectives.
Explain the distance
Not a verdict. An itemised account of what is evidenced, what is partial and what is missing.
What the output looks like
Three states. No score to argue with.
A percentage tells a candidate they failed. A state tells them what to do next.
Supervising a team
Six staff across two units, with dates and a named employer. Meets the requirement as stated.
Budget responsibility
Rota and ordering decisions are described, but no figure or accountability is stated. Confirm the scope and it moves.
Medication administration
Required for this role and not present anywhere in the record. This is a training action, not a wording problem.
Example — illustrative · Oakfield Care
Who it is for
One evidence model. Five different jobs.
Candidates
Know where you stand
Find out why you are being filtered out, and what will actually change it.
For candidates →Public sector & DWPExplainable by design
A disclosed, reproducible method that stands up to a transparency record and an appeal.
Public sector →RecruitersFewer unsuitable applications
Candidates who arrive able to evidence what their CV claims.
Recruiters →EmployersSee past the job title
Compare against one consistent standard, and find capability you were filtering out.
Employers →Training providersGaps that name a course
Every missing requirement is a specific, addressable learning action.
Training providers →GovernanceHow the method is held to account
The blend, the guard, the audit trail and the accessibility floor, in full.
Governance →Provenance
Sixty years of judgement, written into the method.
Michelle Stokes
Recruitment Manager — candidate standards and recruiter judgement
30 years screening candidates
Paul Smeaton
Governance, architecture and platform integrity
Chartered Manager FCMI · Fellow of the Chartered Management Institute · 30 years
3,040
ESCO occupations
WCAG 2.2 AA
Accessibility floor
0 fabrications
By design
Start here
Get hired on what you can prove.
Run a check against a real role and see exactly where you stand — evidenced, partial and missing, line by line.